Last year was good in that we made the top 4, played 2 cup finals and won one, had big results against big PL teams at home (including Barcelona), has shown he can be ruthless most of the time with players and the team was likeable, looking ready to kick on with some signings. Something feels different about him compared to the other managers we've had and I think the club see it too. He's having to deal with being in a circus environment, not saying he's being set up for failure but it definitely does not help him.įrom what I have seen of ETH based on his first season, for me he warrants at least another season and that includes if we do not make the top 4. You have to consider the context of the club. Managing Manchester United is a huge task and most aren't capable of it. But I think he is the best man for this job.
Does the away record need to improve? Yes. Do I question some of his in-game decisions at times? Yes. Do I question some of his decisions off the pitch in terms of transfers? Yes. However, I will personally back ETH right till the end. And usually the first thing to give is the manager! People already (like the OP) bringing the question up so I can see why people would debate it. It's intensified more with these 4 games and the Sancho/Antony/Greenwood/Maguire situations. I don't know what it is, maybe it's the constant negativity off the pitch and the ownership uncertainty. The club has been on what feels like a downward trajectory ever since winning the Carabao Cup.
0 kommentar(er)
